Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Avinash Saraf, Neha Duggar Saraf Vs Runwal Homes Pvt. Ltd. (Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Complaint No. CC006000000000032
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/10/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : RERA
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CUSTOMER IS THE KING: MAHARERA, MUMBAI’s LANDMARK JUDGEMENT (ON REFUND OF AMOUNT WITH IN INTEREST FOR DELAYED POSSESSION)

(Approximate Rs. 2,00,00,000/- Refunded)

In, Avinash Saraf versus Runwal Homes Private Limited case, the landmark judgement given by MAHARERA, Mumbai, having complaint number 32, Dated 13th October 2017.

Final judgement is given by Honorable Shri B. D.KAPADNIS.

The complainants contended that they have paid 97% of total consideration of the flat. The date of possession of the flat was August, 2016, as per agreement of sale executed in November 2014, but the respondent failed to give the Possession in time.

And hence the complainant demanded the amount of consideration with interest @ 21% p.a. from the respondent with compensation for amount expended towards stamp duty and registration charges.

The respondent contended that MAHARERA has come into effect from 1st May 2017. Therefore MAHARERA has no jurisdiction entertain this complaint. The date of possession was delayed due to delay in getting permission for constructing parking from MCGM (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai), for the reasons beyond control of the respondent.

Now point for consideration before The Honorable judge was whether the complainant is entitled to get back the amount paid to respondent with interest and compensation? He answered affirmatively with the following reasons.

The cause of action for claiming possession after the lapse of agreed date of possession becomes recurring course of action. Therefore MAHARERA has the jurisdiction under section 79 of the Act. The reasons given by respondent for delay in possession is also not acceptable, since the agreement was executed in November 2014 it means the respondent was aware of the time for giving possession.

Finally honorable judge has delivered the following judgment.

To refund entire amount paid to the respondent till date with interest and compensation for amount paid towards stamp duty and registration charges. Rate of interest upto the date of 30th April 2017 was decided @  9% per annum. And from 1st May 2017 the rate of interest was decided to be the interest at SBI’s highest marginal cost of lending rate + 2% p.a. till the date of final payment to the complainant.

The complainant got finally Rs. 1,74,17,986/-  + Rs.8,86,800/- towards stamp duty registration charges + Rs. 11,00,000/- towards interest till 30th April 2017 + interest at SBI marginal cost of lending rate plus 2% p.a. till the date of final payment to the complainant.

Thanks to RERA, which gave justice to innocent customer proving famous tagline “CUSTOMER IS THE KING” to be true in real sense.…

Sponsored

Tags:

Author Bio

CA Hiren Devji Sanghvi ♦ 14th rank in Mumbai University in B.Com examination in 1996 with 77.00%. ♦ Stood 1st in second & third year of L.L.B examination along with standing in merit list with 58.50% 3rd year in 2000. ♦ Awarded by Dahisar CPE Study Circle for delivering speech and po View Full Profile

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728