Rajasthan RERA directs JDA to execute agreement as per RERA laws- RERA overrides State laws

Vinod Kumar Agarwal Vs. Jaipur Development Authority (Rajasthan RERA)

 Rajasthan RERA Holds RERA Act As Mandatory And Directs For Execution of Agreement For Sale For Property Sold By Auction By State Development Authorities In a landmark decision, the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority (‘RERA”) on September 22, 2020 has held that Section 13 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2...

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

RERA registration of project when Area is less than 500 sq mtr & flats are more than 8

Geetanjali Aman Constructions Vs Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe (Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai)

This appeal is directed against the order dated 10th December, 2018 of Ld. Member and Adjudicating Officer, MahaRERA as modified by order dated 11th March, 2019 pursuant to Review Application filed by Appellant in Complaint Nos. SC10000672 & SC10000691....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

Multiple proceedings on same issue not permissible under RERA 2016

Mr. Jatin Mavani Vs M/s. Rare Township Pvt. Ltd (RERA)

Since the complainant is also a party to the said proceeding , he can not separately agitate this complaint before the MahaRERA, as it will amount to agitate multiple proceedings on the same issue, which is not permissible in RERA Act, 2016. In the present case since the MahaRERA has already given judgment in the proceeding filed by the c...

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

Selling of open car parking space not allowed: Maha-RERA

Sanjeev Dhakar Vs. M/s. Arkade Realty (Maharera Mumbai)

The complainant, who is a resident in a completed building in the above registered project, has filed this complaint seeking directions of MahaRERA to the respondent to allow him to park his vehicle inside the compound wall of the building. The Complainant has further alleged that the Respondent is selling open car parking by collecting i...

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

Customs is the King: Maharera, Mumbai’s Landmark Judgement (on Refund of Amount with in Interest for Delayed Possession)

Avinash Saraf, Neha Duggar Saraf Vs Runwal Homes Pvt. Ltd. (Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai)

In, Avinash Saraf versus Runwal Homes Private Limited case, the landmark judgement given by MAHARERA, Mumbai, having complaint number 32, Dated 13th October 2017. Final judgement is given by Honorable Shri B. D.KAPADNIS....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,607)
Company Law (7,501)
Custom Duty (8,562)
DGFT (4,569)
Excise Duty (4,502)
Fema / RBI (4,754)
Finance (5,073)
Income Tax (37,809)
SEBI (4,041)
Service Tax (3,739)

Search Posts by Date

July 2021