This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CCI Lacks Jurisdiction Over Patent Holder’s Actions Under Patents Act: Delhi HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Vs Competition Commission of India And Another (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Vs Competition Commission of India And Another (Delhi High Court)
In this legal battle, four appeals and a writ petition were at the heart of a crucial question: Does the Competition Commission of India (CCI) have the authority to investigate the actions of a patentee when a patent is granted in India and the patentee asserts their rights? Let’s break it down:
Background:
Ericsson, the Swedish multinational, filed two writ petitions—one against CCI and Micromax Informatics Limited, and another against Intex Technologies (India) Limited.
The CCI had i...
Author Info
