Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Neha Saraf vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.2172/M/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/05/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ms. Neha. Saraf Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

In a recent decision made by ITAT, Mumbai in case of Neha Saraf vs. ACIT it has been decided that where an employee receives Interest Free loan from the employer it shall be taxable in the hands of the employee as salary as per the provisions of the section.

Brief facts of the case: 

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Practicing Chartered Accountant working in the field of Goods & Services Tax & Real Estate (RERA) Consultancy in Rajasthan. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Decoding of Clause 44 of Tax Audit Report (3CD) Brief on Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Rules, 2017 Introduction to Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) An Overview with respect to Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (Rajasthan) GST on Second Hand Goods View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

4 Comments

  1. Bhadkamkar Avinash Vishnu says:

    If loan of Rs.100000/- is taken by employee perks will be Rs.15000/- or Rs.115000/- for calculating Income Tax?

  2. Hardik Rokani says:

    Whether Rs 20,000 amount should be considered aggregate once in a whole year or it should be counted individually. Means Loan given of Rs 19,000 & repaid & then again loan given of Rs 18,000 in a year.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031