Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohit Goyal Vs. ICAI & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

The writ petition was filed by the appellant who is a student of respondent No.1 – Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. He gave the Final Examination of the respondents in November, 2013. He did not He thereafter applied for Suggestive Answers, Re-evaluation of the marks and Certified copy of his answer sheet.

It is the contention of the appellant that when he got the copy of the answer sheet, he found that the examiner had not properly checked the papers. It is also his contention that despite the appellant havi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. drparasjain says:

    Miscarriage of justice is always inbuilt any system of examination. Hence , while one can sympathise with the student , one has to applaud with approval the decision taken by the courts as in such cases remedy will be worse than maldy as it would invite lakhs of students grieving their results on some ground or the other . Having said that , I deplore the laxity shown by the examiner and the moderator and seriously resist the Institute to devise a robust system of checks and balances to avoid recurrences of events like this .

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031