Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Learn about the clubbing provisions under the Income Tax Act, covering income transfers, revocable transfers, and taxation of inco...
Income Tax : Understand the provisions of Sections 269SS, 269ST, and 269T under Indian tax law, their implications, and reporting requirements ...
Income Tax : Learn about Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs), including eligibility, investment limits, interest rates, redemption, and tax implication...
Income Tax : Rental income from sub-letting is taxed as "Income from other sources," not "Income from house property." Deemed ownership rules a...
Income Tax : Understand presumptive taxation schemes under sections 44AD, 44ADA, and 44AE, including eligibility, computation, and maintenance ...
Income Tax : Join our 5-day live course from Sept 8-12, 2024, for an in-depth understanding of tax audits under Section 44AB, with practical in...
Income Tax : Learn to handle faceless income tax assessments using AI tools like ChatGPT in a 2-hour live course on Sept 1, 2024. Enhance effic...
Income Tax : The Central Action Plan 2024-2025 by CBDT aims to optimize India's direct tax system, focusing on revenue, litigation, taxpayer se...
Income Tax : Join our live course from Aug 23-25, 2024, to master tax audits, including Form 3CD, financial statements, and GST, with practical...
Income Tax : As of August 11, 2024, net direct tax collections for FY 2024-25 stand at Rs. 6.93 lakh crores, marking a 22.48% growth compared t...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deletes disallowance of capital gains by DCIT after confirming investment in property with Charity Commissioner approv...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that confirmation of addition u/s. 69A and 68 of the Income Tax Act without finding any fault with the evidence s...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that compensation paid to ESOP holders qualifies as perquisite and hence taxable under the head ‘salary�...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that invocation of section 263 by PCIT unjustified due lack of sufficient evidence to support claim that the o...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act towards Long Term Capital Gains admissible even when ret...
Income Tax : Finance Act 2023 updates the process for filing applications under Section 10(46A) of the Income-tax Act. Standardized procedures ...
Income Tax : On August 16, 2024, President Droupadi Murmu officially granted her assent to the Finance (No 2) Bill, 2024. With this move, the b...
Income Tax : Explore the Finance Bill 2024, detailing income tax rates, surcharges, and provisions for various taxpayers, including individuals...
Income Tax : Insight Instruction No. 79 details procedures for managing high-risk PAN cases in the Insight portal, guiding tax officers through...
Income Tax : UIDAI's specified income receives tax exemption for AY 2024-2025 to 2028-2029 under Income-tax Act, 1961, as per the latest CBDT n...
INTRODUCTION The proviso to section 17(2)(iii) has been omitted. So far the value of any benefit provided by the company free of cost or at a concessional rate to its employees by way of allotment of shares, debentures or warrants, directly or indirectly under any Employees Stock Option Plan or Scheme of the Company offered to […]
There is a difference between dismissal of a Special Leave Petition and dismissal of an Appeal. While the dismissal of a SLP does not result in merger of the judgment of the High Court with that of the Supreme Court and there is no affirmation, the dismissal of an Appeal results in an affirmation and merger of the order of the High Court into that of the Supreme Court.
Where the assessee had its own funds as well as borrowed funds and it advanced funds to its sister concerns for allegedly non-business purposes and the question arose whether the AO was justified in disallowing the interest on the borrowed funds on the ground that they had been used for non-business purposes, HELD: Where an assessee has his own funds as well as borrowed funds, a presumption can be made that t
(i) S. 149, which imposes the limitation period, requires the notice to be “issued” but not “served” within the limitation period. Once a notice is issued within the period of limitation, jurisdiction becomes vested in the AO to proceed to reassess. Service is not a condition precedent to conferment of jurisdiction but it is a condition precedent to the making of the order of assessment;
2. This civil appeal filed by the assessee is directed against judgment and order dated 22.9.2006 in ITA No. 164/04 by the Delhi High Court. By the impugned judgment, confirming the decision of the Tribunal, the High Court has held that the appellant (assessee) is not entitled to claim depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“1961 Act” for short) in respect of two separate transactions
(ii) where proper enquiries have been conducted by the Assessing Officer and he has followed the principles of natural justice, the order passed by him cannot be said to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue simply because the ld. Commissioner does not agree with him and he is of the view that addition of a higher amount should have been made;
With a view to make appeals process-compliant and to ensure acceleration in the process of dispensation of justice, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal)1 has proposed to devise a new system for appeal filing and fixation.
13.5 That in the case of running contracts, no income, profits or gains can in fact be computed unless the contract is completed and if the contract is completed in a period of more than a year, the crucial time for calculating the income, profits and gains arrives only when the entire contract is completed in other words, argument was that the only method by which the gains or profits of the assessee could be determined was to wait until
Where a Malaysian company supplied technical personnel to the assessee (a Dutch company) on terms that the personnel would remain under the control of the assessee and that the Malaysian company would have no role to play in the execution of the Project and the question arose whether the recipient had a “supervisory activities” PE under Article 5 (4) (a) and the sums received was assessable as business profits
Where the ITO conducted a survey u/s 133A of the Act on the premises of the Petitioner, a practicing Chartered Accountant, and impounded books of account /documents belonging to the Petitioner and retained such books of account/documents and the Petitioner filed a Writ Petition to challenge the same, HELD, allowing the Petition:
