Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Bombay High Court held that exporters are entitled to both input side and output side rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise R...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Hyderabad directs refund of CVD/SAD paid post-GST on failed EPCG export obligation, citing eligibility under transitional...
Excise Duty : Delhi High Court rules mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F for tax appeals filed after 2014 amendment cannot be waived, citing...
Excise Duty : Chhattisgarh High Court sets aside Central Excise show cause notices pending over 11 years, citing unreasonable delay and statutor...
Excise Duty : Rajasthan High Court criticized the CESTAT for failing to consider and discuss the binding precedent set by the Supreme Court in B...
Excise Duty : CBIC sets up interim boards for settlement across Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai, appointing principal chief commissioners an...
Excise Duty : Four Interim Boards for Settlement under Central Excise Act established in Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai by CBIC notificatio...
Excise Duty : Indian government revises central excise duty on petrol to Rs. 13/litre and diesel to Rs. 10/litre, effective April 8, 2025....
Excise Duty : CBIC assigns post-GST legacy excise and service tax appeals to designated officers for adjudication. Details available in attached...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
CESTAT Kolkata rules on excise duty for physician samples distributed free of cost by medicament manufacturers. Analysis of the case of Parker Robinson Private Limited vs. CCE.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that fact of clandestine manufacture and clearance thereof is established, however, since there is no clinching tangible evidence or any corroborative evidence to establish the appellant as a manufacturer, liability of duty, penalty cannot be fastened.
Explore the Kanade Anand Udyog vs. CCE Thane case, highlighting the denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods. Detailed analysis and verdict discussed.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that suo moto re-credit duly allowable as eligibility of cenvat credit on outward transportation has attained finality and decided in favour of the appellant.
CESTAT Mumbai held that in case of premature availment of cenvat credit on capital goods the recovery proceedings under rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR, 2004) would not sustain and only interest liability will arise.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services related to pollution control of the factory is covered within the term ‘input services’ as per rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and hence eligible for cenvat credit.
CESTAT Mumbai held that prior to amendment i.e. till 31.03.2008 CENVAT Credit on outward transportation from the ‘place of removal’ is admissible. As entire period of dispute is pre-amendment, CENVAT Credit available and demand unsustainable.
CESTAT Kolkata held that penalty under rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules 2002 leviable as involvement in clandestine manufacture and clearance is well established.
No excise duty was leviable under section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the allegation of illicit clearing as the department had miserably failed to substantiate the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance by any tangible or corroborative evidence
Excise duty demand of approximately 24 crores against Volkswagen India was quashed on the amount recovered as liquidated damages on the ground of non-violation of Rule 6 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 and in the event of rejection of the invoice value as transaction value, it was not open to the adjudicating authority to re-determine value without recourse to Rule 6 of Central Excise Rules.
