Custom Duty Meaning, Calculators, Rules, exemptions Articles Notification, Circulars, Recent Changes, Duty Drawback Rates, Custom Rates, Anti-Dumping Duty
Custom Duty : The Supreme Court rules DRI officers as proper officers for customs under Section 28, overturning past judgments and reshaping tax...
Custom Duty : Delhi HC rules customs cannot override DGFT decisions on MEIS benefits in Designco v. UOI case, declaring customs actions as illeg...
Custom Duty : Understand the key Customs Act amendments in Budget 2025. Learn how changes impact importers, exporters, and compliance under the ...
Custom Duty : The Union Budget 2025 introduces changes in Customs duties, excise, and tax rates, focusing on tariff rationalization, support for...
Custom Duty : Decoding the Bill of entry : Understanding its key terms So Basically a BOE Contains five parts namely , 1. Bill of entry summary...
Custom Duty : The government exempts import duties on specific life-saving drugs for rare diseases under set conditions. Learn about eligibility...
Custom Duty : This FAQ guide provides clarity on key aspects of customs duties and tariff structure updates in Budget 2025-26. Basic Customs Dut...
Custom Duty : Apply for the Indirect Tax Internship Scheme FY 2025-26 at CBIC, available for law students and graduates. Stipends and certificat...
Custom Duty : Summary of SEBI and Customs Notifications for February 2025 including amendments to duties, exemptions, and changes to specific ta...
Custom Duty : Union Budget 2025-26 proposes changes in customs duties, including exemptions for life-saving medicines, e-mobility, and support f...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court held that provisions of section 138(B) of the Customs Act doesn’t provide unfettered right in all cases for cro...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court held that imposition of condition in case of provisional release of seized goods is discretionary and hence direc...
Custom Duty : Madras High Court held that the Baggage Rule, 2016 will apply only to the baggage and not to the jewellery worn in person. Accordi...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Chennai held that when the benefit of an exemption Notification is claimed, the claimant has to necessarily fulfil all the...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that communication modules being parts of communication hubs is classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90. Accordingly, ...
Custom Duty : New CSD web portal launched for container scanning data and image uploads. Includes officer guidelines, SOPs, and reporting compli...
Custom Duty : Customs office mandates upting mobile numbers and email IDs linked to DPD registration to prevent misuse. Importers must verify ch...
Custom Duty : Learn how to check container scanning status via the CSD web portal at JNCH. Enter container details to verify scanning and examin...
Custom Duty : Customs Commissioner renews Nhava Sheva Freeport Terminal Pvt. Ltd.'s custodianship and CCSP status for 5 years under Customs Act,...
Custom Duty : CBIC amends Customs Notification No. 61/94, adding Rajkot for unloading imported goods and loading export goods under the Customs ...
CESTAT Delhi held that penalty under section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 is not imposable as the only declaration made by the respondent is the Bill of Entry and the goods were found as per the declaration in the Bill of Entry.
The goods imported such as main PCB, lightning protector, DC/AC cables, fuse holders are neither parts nor accessories of Integrated Fixed Wireless Telephones ( IFWT )could not be considered as accessory as these parts were not used to increase the effectiveness or convenience of IFWT. Therefore, the goods imported were neither parts nor accessories of IFWT and therefore could not avail the benefit of notification for Customs duty exemption.
Appellant is eligible for refund even though condition 2(b) of Notification No.102/2007-Cus. dated 14.09.2007 not been complied
Principal Commissioner of Customs Vs Akshoy Kumar Ghosh & Sons (Calcutta High Court) This intra-Court appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 01.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPA 26090/2022. By the said order the learned Single Bench directed the Chief Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs to appoint another […]
R M Trading Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue involved in the present case is that whether the goods in question i.e. bhusi/ bhuki of pulses / pulses waste cleared from Kandla SEZ is classifiable under Chapter heading 07139099 or 11061000 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and consequently whether the appellant is […]
Veer Enterprise Vs C.C.-Kandla (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT find the goods have been cleared and duty discharged as per the Tariff Heading proposed by the department. The Certificate of Chartered Engineer produced by the party is actually deficient, as it has been obtained behind the back of Customs Officials and does not show the time and […]
S. Vaidya and Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) Brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed three refund claims for refund of SAD amount of Rs.10,97,996/-. After scrutinizing the documents, the adjudicating authority observed that the sales invoices were not endorsed with the mandatory declaration that “no cenvat credit can be […]
Refund claim of SAD is not time barred as no such limitation is prescribed under original notification no.102/2007-Customs. It was also held that period of limitation for first time cannot be introduced through subordinate legislation or notification.
CESTAT held that refund claim of SAD is not time barred as no such limitation is prescribed under original Notification No.102 of 2007-Customs dated 14.09.2007
Sunil Garg Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Appeal is filed against penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority under section 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that there is contradiction in the statement of the appellant as well as the third party. Therefore, these statements cannot […]
