Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Understand the updated TDS rates for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27). Comprehensive chart covering salary, interest, dividends, rent, and ...
Income Tax : Budget 2025 revises income tax slabs, making ₹4,00,000 tax-free. New rates range up to 30% for income above ₹24,00,000. Key de...
Income Tax : Income tax bill, 2025 aims to replace Income Tax Act, 1961, simplifying tax laws. Questions arise about its impact on revenue, lit...
Income Tax : Income Tax Bill 2025 introduces changes to TDS, TCS, and LRS provisions, raising threshold limits and reducing compliance burdens....
Income Tax : CIT International Tax- 1 Vs Expeditors International of Washington INC (Delhi High Court); ITA 202/2022; Dated: 13/02/2025 In a si...
Income Tax : The Institute of Cost Accountants of India seeks inclusion of Cost Accountants in the definition of "Accountant" under Section 515...
Income Tax : Explore the Finance Bill 2025 highlights, including revised tax rates, TDS/TCS amendments, ULIP taxation, and updated rules for sa...
Income Tax : ICMAI addresses the non-inclusion of 'Cost Accountant' in the Income Tax Bill 2025. The Council is engaging with policymakers to e...
Income Tax : Lok Sabha issues corrigenda for the Income-tax Bill, 2025, correcting references, formatting, and legal citations. Read the key am...
Income Tax : KSCAA's representation to CBDT highlights challenges in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, focusing on delayed appeals and suggesti...
Income Tax : Bombay HC rules in CIT vs. Nitish Chordia that agricultural land distance must be measured by road, not aerial view, impacting cap...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat rules that for capital gains tax on agricultural land, municipal limits are determined by notification in force at the...
Income Tax : ITAT remands case regarding taxability of interest income earned before business commencement, citing need for fresh adjudication ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court rules reassessment proceedings against Alok Industries invalid post-resolution plan approval under IBC, citing S...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur dismisses Bansi Lal's appeal, upholding additions for unexplained bank deposits and interest income. Tribunal cites l...
Income Tax : Key updates on income tax deduction from salaries under Section 192 for FY 2024-25, including amendments, surcharge rates, and new...
Income Tax : CBDT extends the due date for filing Form 56F under Section 10AA(8) and 10A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to March 31, 2025, for...
Income Tax : The Central Government notifies Punjab RERA for tax exemption under Section 10(46A) of the Income-tax Act, effective from the 2024...
Income Tax : The Indian government is set to introduce the new Income Tax Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on February 13, 2025. This comprehensive...
Income Tax : Bhaikaka University, Gujarat, is approved for scientific research under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, effective f...
NC Notification No. 66/2011 – Income Tax WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Number S.O.915(E), dated the 27th August, 2002, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial Number 15, “Pratham Delhi Education Initiative at Delhi” by Pratham Delhi Education Initiative, 3rd Floor, ICICI Ltd., NBCC Place, Bhisham Pitamah Marg, Pragati Vihar, New Delhi – 110003, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with assessment year 2003-04, which was extended further vide Notification Number S.O. 149(E), dated the 3rd February, 2006 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2005-06 and which was extended further vide Notification Number S.O.2375(E), dated the 3rd October, 2008 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
NC Notification No. 60/2011 – Income Tax Whereas by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Number S.O. 2370(E), dated 3rd October, 2008, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial Number 12, Initiative for empowerment of widow women and person with disabilities through promoting water harvesting structures and livelihood activities by Manila Mandal Banner Agor, Near New Power House, Indira Colony, Barmer, Rajasthan., as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
NC Notification No. 70/2011 – Income Tax Whereas by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Number S.O.267(E), dated the 23rd March, 2000, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial Number 8, “Rural Development Projects at 30 Villages of Tamilnadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra” by Srinivasan Services Trust, Jayalakshmi Estates, 8, Haddows Road, Chennai – 600006, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with assessment year 2000-01, which was extended further vide Notification Number S.O. 1116(E), dated the 24th October, 2002 for a period of three years beginning with assessment year 2003-04 and which was extended further vide Notification Number S.O.509(E), dated the 4th April, 2006 for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2005-2006, which was extended further vide Notification Number S.O.242(E), dated 21st January, 2009 for a period of three years beginning with the financial year 2008-09
NC Notification No. 59/2011 – Income Tax Whereas by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Number S.O. 2370(E), dated 3rd October, 2008, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial Number 13, New home-(Childrens’ Home) by Reaching Hand, 60/2, 1st Floor, Nehru Road, Kammanahalli Extension, St. Thomas Town Post, Bangalore 560 084, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
NC Notification No. 65/2011 – Income Tax WHEREAS by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Number S.O. 2370(E), dated 3rd October, 2008, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial Number 6, (a) Disha Special School and Therapy Centre, (b) Disha Autism Centre, and (c) Community based rehabilitation programme by Disha Charitable Trust, 319, Race Course Towers, Gotri Road, Vadodara 390 007, Gujarat, as an eligible project or scheme for a period of three years beginning with financial year 2008-09;
NC Notification No. 50/2011 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the National Committee for Promotion of Social and Economic Welfare, hereby notifies the institutions approved by the said National Committee, mentioned in column (2) of the Table below, and approves the eligible projects or schemes specified to be carried on by the said institutions and the estimated cost thereof as mentioned in column (3) of the said Table, and also specifies in the column (4) of the Table the maximum amount of such cost which may be allowed as deduction under the said section 35AC for the period of approval,
Merck Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) – Provisions of sec. 94 are very much clear and it cannot be said that there is any ambiguity in the provisions and therefore, appellant should not have claimed the aforesaid loss knowing fully well that the provisions of sec. 94 are applicable to such transactions. Appellant has adjusted the aforesaid loss against the profit on sale of short term capital gains which is illegal. Appellant being a reputed company, advised by reputed and learned counsels for the past many years cannot be said to be not aware of the said provisions of the Act. For the above reasons, appellant’s submissions on this issue are rejected and it is held that AO is right in levying penalty u/s 271(1) and holding that the appellant has furnished inaccurate particulars of its income. – Assessee’s appeal partly allowed.
M/s Kone Elevator India Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (Madras High Court) – As per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, once the Assessing Officer has come to the conclusion that the taxable amount has escaped assessment, two conditions were required to be satisfied on the basis of the materials placed before him. Both these conditions were conditions precedent to be satisfied before the Assessing Officer could have jurisdiction to issue notice under section 148 read with section 147(a). But under the substituted section 147 existence of the first condition alone is suffice. In other words if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that certain income assessable to tax has escaped assessment it confers jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. It is, however, to be noted that both the conditions must be fulfilled if the case falls within the ambit of the proviso to section 147. Hence, we are not able to appreciate the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that the Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to reopen the assessment.
ITO v Gujarat Information Technology Fund (ITAT Ahemdabad) Interest income earned on bank deposit is exempt u/s 10(23FB) and there is no decision of SEBI that there is any violation of SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulation 1996 and, therefore, the AO cannot hold that there was such violation. The AO is duty bound to enquire whether the assessee trust is registered under the Registration Act, 1908 and has been granted a certificate of registration by SEBI under SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations, 1996 and not beyond that.
Explore the verdict in Hidelbergcement India Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) on reassessment validity and foreign exchange gain dispute. Legal insights here.
