Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Learn about IMF Registration for private limited companies, its process, requirements, and benefits. Expand into insurance marketi...
Corporate Law : Businesses opting for LLP registration in India benefit from lower compliance burdens, tax advantages, and an easier business setu...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Corporate Law : Explore the reality of women in leadership. Legal mandates like SEBI and Companies Act aim for diversity, but true inclusion deman...
Corporate Law : Avoid penalties by preventing common mistakes in Pvt Ltd annual return filing, such as missing deadlines, incorrect data, and non-...
Corporate Law : Manan Kumar Mishra wins a 7th term as Bar Council of India Chairman. His leadership continues as legal professionals push for High...
Corporate Law : IRDAI permits insurers to use equity derivatives for hedging, aiming to reduce portfolio risks amid market volatility. Strict comp...
Corporate Law : RTI Act permits access only to information held by a public authority and does not require the creation or interpretation of infor...
Corporate Law : Bar Council of India supports govt’s decision to revise Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025, ensuring fair consultation and safegua...
Corporate Law : The Competition Commission of India seeks public feedback on the draft Cost of Production Regulations 2025, replacing the 2009 rul...
Corporate Law : Employment on compassionate grounds had been evolved to help dependents, of our employees who die or become totally and permanentl...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC lays down guidelines for regulated smartphone use in schools, balancing safety with misuse prevention. Full details on pr...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court affirms that property contributed to a partnership firm becomes firm property, denying exclusive rights to legal hei...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that interest at 8% p.a. must be paid on refunded e-stamp duty, reinforcing the doctrine of undue retentio...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that rejection of belated claim by liquidator needs to be challenged under section 42 of the IBC. Relief cannot b...
Corporate Law : FSSAI invites public feedback on draft amendments to Vegan Foods Regulations, 2022. Suggestions to be submitted within 60 days via...
Corporate Law : IRDAI allows insurers to hedge equity risks using derivatives. The guidelines specify permitted instruments, risk management, and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI issues disciplinary order against Subhash Chand Agrawal for alleged non-compliance during CIRP of two companies. Key findings...
Corporate Law : Details of Judicial and Technical Members assigned to NCLT benches across India as per the latest order issued by the Ministry of ...
Corporate Law : IRDAI mandates a 4% obligatory cession to GIC Re for 2025-26, excluding terrorism and nuclear risks. Learn about commission rates ...
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails the order dated 05.05.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh allowing the appeal and dismissing order dated 28.01.2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhatinda.
Explore impact of Jan Vishwas Act 2023 on Legal Metrology Act, 2009. Discover revised penalties and its role in promoting ease of doing business.
Discover how beneficiaries play a crucial role in maximizing impact of CSR initiatives. Learn about their responsibilities and benefits of active participation
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails order dated 06.02.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assailing the order dated 11.08.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur.
In present facts of the case, it was held that findings of State Commission that the patient and his family members were not informed about the risk nor their consent was obtained, do not suffer from any illegality as procedure/risk was explained to the patient.
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 14.12.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’).
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) have refused to condone the delay for 125 days as no ‘sufficient cause’ was shown because there was difference in oral submissions and the contents of the Application submitted.
In present facts of the case, the Complaint of the patient was dismissed and it was observed that it is natural that if any patient consults with a doctor, then he would inform about all alternative modes of treatment.
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (NCDRC) have allowed the Revision Petition in favour of the Complainant as medical negligence of the doctor was established as the Complainant was able to discharge its initial burden of proof.
