The Calcutta High Court ordered the revival of a GST registration that was canceled for non-filing of returns, stating that cancellation is counter-productive to revenue.
CESTAT Kolkata ruled on the timely filing of an appeal, stating that without proof of service, the date an attested copy was provided can be considered the date of service.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in the case of N.Srinivasa Rao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, directed authorities to consider a petitioner for promotion despite a pending departmental inquiry, citing administrative timelines for such proceedings.
Uttarakhand High Court held that inquiries into GST registration, dues, and TDS deductions cannot be addressed through a writ petition and advised proper authority approach.
The Calcutta High Court reinstated Sourav Ganguly’s GST appeal, calling the demand for a further pre-deposit a travesty of justice since an excess amount had already been recovered.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court stayed SARFAESI Act proceedings for borrowers against Hinduja Housing Finance, subject to a Rs.10 lakh deposit, leading to the regularization of the account.
CAAR Mumbai held that MOOWR units can claim IGCR duty benefits on inputs but scrap generated must follow Section 65(2), attracting duty if cleared to DTA.
The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR) issued a ruling on Siemens application for vacuum circuit breaker parts, confirming their classification under CTIs 8538 and 8535.
Allahabad High Court criticises GST officers for ignoring binding precedents in Rajdhani Udyog case; seeks affidavits from officials on non-compliance.
GSTAT rules M/s Hotel Babylon Inn Pvt. Ltd. profiteered ₹31,28,631 by not passing GST rate reduction benefit to consumers. Details and judgment analysis.
