Follow Us:

Single GST Notice for Multiple Years Set Aside Due to Distinct Cause of Action per Year

April 16, 2026 492 Views 0 comment Print

The Court held that each financial year creates a separate cause of action, making a consolidated notice legally unsustainable. It quashed the notice and allowed fresh year-wise proceedings.

Consolidated GST Notice Held Invalid for Combining Several Assessment Years

April 16, 2026 606 Views 0 comment Print

The ruling found that issuing a single notice for multiple tax years violates statutory requirements. The Court quashed the notice and permitted authorities to issue separate notices for each year.

Mechanical Issue of Reassessment Notices Invalid as Lack of Application of Mind Established

April 16, 2026 408 Views 0 comment Print

The case examined whether a modified return could be scrutinized again after assessment. The ruling clarified that once assessment is completed considering reorganisation, further scrutiny is impermissible.

Madras HC Allows Time-Barred GST Appeal Citing Minor 9-Day Delay & Illness

April 16, 2026 870 Views 0 comment Print

The issue was rejection of an appeal filed beyond the condonable period under GST law. The Court allowed reconsideration due to a minor nine-day delay supported by valid reasons.

No Proof of Importer’s Role in MRP Alteration: CESTAT Sets Aside CVD Demand

April 16, 2026 435 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that differential CVD cannot be demanded without evidence linking the importer to MRP alteration. Allegations based on assumptions and third-party actions were rejected.

No Service Tax Penalty if Tax & Interest Paid Pre-SCN & No Intent to Evade: CESTAT Hyderabad

April 16, 2026 489 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that no penalty is leviable where service tax and interest are paid before issuance of notice. Absence of fraud or suppression entitled the assessee to relief.

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Invalid as AO Failed to Specify Charge: ITAT Delhi

April 16, 2026 723 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT held that penalty proceedings are invalid where the Assessing Officer does not specify whether the charge is concealment or inaccurate particulars. The penalty was quashed due to lack of clarity and inconsistency.

CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit on Pre-01.04.2011 Services; Invoice Timing Irrelevant if Services Rendered Earlier

April 16, 2026 513 Views 0 comment Print

The issue was denial of credit due to post-amendment invoicing. The Tribunal held that credit is admissible since services were completed before the cut-off date.

Appeal by Suspended Director in Corporate Debtor’s Name Not Maintainable Post-CIRP: SC

April 16, 2026 525 Views 0 comment Print

**SEO Description:** Supreme Court holds that an appeal filed by a suspended director in the name of the corporate debtor after admission of CIRP is not maintainable. It rules that such a fundamentally incompetent appeal cannot be cured or converted after expiry of limitation under Section 61(2) of the IBC, and sets aside NCLAT’s contrary approach.

SC Upholds Condonation of Form 10B Delay as delay was Due to Honest Oversight by CA 

April 16, 2026 1296 Views 0 comment Print

The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court’s order condoning delay in filing Form 10B. It upheld that a genuine explanation and completed compliance justified relief.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031