Rajdev Inter Trade Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad) analysis: Remelted zinc deemed as zinc alloy, attracting 7.5% customs duty. Detailed order review.
Delhi High Court sets aside an order regarding the cancellation of GST retrospectively in absence of a reply to an opportunity to hear under Section 75(4) CGST Act, remitting the matter for re-adjudication.
Analysis of ITAT Hyderabad’s ruling on a penalty order, questioning misreporting of income when the issue was under-reporting, in Mohd. Sarwar Vs ITO case.
Explore the detailed analysis of Mack Star Marketing Private Limited Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre Delhi regarding taxing unsold flats in real estate business, applicable from AY 2018-19. ITAT deletes notional rent addition for AY 2014-15.
CESTAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., stating no confiscation if prior permission taken for storage of non-bonded goods in bonded warehouse. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
Philips India Limited vs Commissioner of Customs (Air Cargo) case analyzed by CESTAT Chennai. Detailed order reveals why differential duty demand was unsustainable.
Allahabad High Court quashes benami transaction proceedings in Smt. Meera Pandey Vs Union of India case, stating contractor’s statement alone insufficient. Read full judgment.
Delhi High Court orders re-adjudication of two SCN demanding GST for the same tax period, providing detailed analysis. Read the full judgment here.
Analysis of Lalita Mohan Das Vs. Assistant Director case at Orissa High Court regarding the applicability of PMLA Act Section 45 and Section 205 Cr.P.C. in granting exemption from personal appearance.
In a case of transfer expenses, Mumbai ITAT directs to allow stamp duty & registration charges. Detailed analysis of the case provided here.
