Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment on royalty payments by Dabur India Ltd, implications for tax deductions under Sections 80IC & 80IB, and its impact on industrial undertakings.
Impugned order and notice indicated that sanctioning authority was PCIT. However, since issuance date of both documents was beyond three years from relevant assessment year, Section 151(ii) of Act mandated that sanctioning authority should have been PCCIT.
ITAT held that if sales are not disputed and there is no discrepancy between purchases and declared sales, addition should be restricted to bring gross profit on alleged bogus purchases in line with other genuine purchases.
The tribunal emphasized that the CIT(E) should have evaluated the entire trust deed in conjunction with the actual charitable activities conducted by the trust to determine whether it solely served the Christian community or provided benefits to the broader community.
ACIT Vs Merchant Agri Global Private Limited – Detailed analysis of Mumbai ITAT’s decision regarding adhoc disallowance of expenses without rejecting books of account. Full text of the order provided.
Petitioner contended that disputes regarding insolvency and winding up are non-arbitrable. However, HC noted that objections to arbitrator’s jurisdiction could be raised before arbitral tribunal itself.
The court examined the legal provisions and previous judgments, emphasizing the disqualification of an arbitrator with an interest in the outcome of the dispute. It noted that the unilateral appointment of the arbitrator by the Government of Kerala, a party to the dispute, violated legal principles established by the Supreme Court. Therefore, the appointment was deemed legally invalid.
In the case of Principal Commissioner of Custom Vs Khan Sadaf, the Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had the jurisdiction to entertain an application for compounding of an offence under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Shanno Mohammed Yusuf Warsi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The case of Shanno Mohammed Yusuf Warsi Vs Income Tax Officer (ITO) at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai revolves around the taxation of long-term capital gains (LTCG) from penny stock transactions, specifically involving shares of Essar (India) Ltd. The central question is whether the assessee […]
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved the Resolution Plan, emphasizing the paramount importance of the CoC’s commercial wisdom in such matters. The approval included various directions regarding the plan’s implementation, extinguishment of existing shares, reliefs, amendments to MoA and AoA, and cessation of the moratorium.
