Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on imports of 2-Ethyl hexanol originating in or exported from European Union, Indonesia, Korea RP, Malaysia, Taiwan and United States of America for a period of 5 years. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi, the 26th March, 2021 Notification No. 17/2021-Customs (ADD) G.S.R. 215(E).—Whereas, the designated authority, vide […]
Reg. Continuation of anti-dumping duty on imports of ‘Tyre Curing Presses also known as Tyre Vulcanisers or Rubber Processing Machineries for tyres, excluding Six Day Light Curing Press for curing bi-cycle tyres’ falling under 8477 51 00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, originating in or exported from Peoples’ Republic of China […]
Please refer to the order by Ministry of Home Affairs vide No.40-3/2020-DMI(A), dated 24th March 2020, and the guidelines issued subsequently, pursuant to a decision to impose a complete lock down in view of the threat imposed by the spread of COVID-19.
D.S. Cargo Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) No doubt, there is no document on record as provided by the Department, burden to prove otherwise rests upon the Department but it is settled principle of law that the appellants admission are the best proof which need no further proof. Hence, the burden need not […]
1. (1) These rules may be called the Calcium Carbide (Amendment) Rules, 2021. (2) These shall come into force on the date of their final publication in the Official Gazette. 2. In the said rules, in Rule 31, sub-rule (1) the words maximum of three years shall be substituted with “maximum of ten years”.
Indus Biotech Private Limited Vs Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund (Earlier Known As Kotak India Venture Limited) & Ors. (Supreme Court) It is clarified that in any proceeding which is pending before the Adjudicating Authority under Section 7 of IB Code, if such petition is admitted upon the Adjudicating Authority recording the satisfaction with regard […]
Inox India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) As regard the limitation, I find that there is no dispute that the appellant is availing the Cenvat credit and declaring in their monthly returns. The issue involved is also of interpretation of Cenvat Credit Rules and on this issue there are number of cases […]
Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs TVS Motor Co. Ltd. (Madras High Court) The facts clearly show that there is direct nexus between the activity of TVSFS with that of the activity of the We say so because of the exclusive arrangement between the assessee and TVSFS. The Revenue has not disputed the factual […]
(1) These regulations may be called the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) (Finance Company) Regulations, 2021. (2) They shall come into force from the date of its notification in the Official Gazette.
The Assessing Officer rejected the reply filed by the appellant by holding that there was no opening and closing stock of goods and all the goods were purchased as sold out during the assessment year. Further, the Trading, Profit and Loss Account disclosed gross loss and had the dealer sold all the goods purchased with a marginal increase in sale price over the purchase price, then the Trading Account would reflect a different picture with a gross profit.
