This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No penalty if intention to evade duty is not found
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Inox India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Inox India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
As regard the limitation, I find that there is no dispute that the appellant is availing the Cenvat credit and declaring in their monthly returns. The issue involved is also of interpretation of Cenvat Credit Rules and on this issue there are number of cases were made out by the department. In these circumstances it cannot be said that the appellant had a mala fide intention to evade the excise duty by taking the wrong credit. I do not find any suppression of fact or misstatement on the part of the appellant. Therefore, the demand for ...
