Ajit Kumar Khan Vs DCIT case at ITAT Ranchi clarifies that late filing fees for GST returns cannot be added summarily through intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
The ITAT Chennai in Jamal Mohideen Haroon Imran Khan Vs ITO case allows a delay of 227 days in appeal filing due to the death of assessee’s advocate during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Bill of Entry has been finalized as per declared value and when Bill of Entry has been finally assessed at declared value then redemption fine and penalties cannot be imposed.
Sundaram Industries Ltd wins appeal against imposition of service tax on clearing and forwarding agency services provided outside India as per a ruling by CESTAT Chennai.
The Calcutta High Court overturned a tax assessment order following a technical issue with the Income Tax Portal that prevented a timely objection.
CESTAT Mumbai’s ruling on the Khandelwal Laboratories P Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE case underscores the principle that duty-paid goods used as input should qualify for MODVAT credit, regardless of the name on the Bills of Entry.
ITAT found that the issue related to the belated filing of TDS returns and subsequent levying of fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act was a matter of factual verification. Thus, it was not covered under Section 154 of the Act, which only allows rectification for apparent mistakes on record.
CESTAT Ahmedabad recently rejected Nirma Limited’s appeal, determining that the clearance of goods without a lab test and claiming goods were mixed in a tank was an afterthought.
In a recent judgement, Calcutta High Court affirmed that an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act is not a final assessment order, nor does it give rise to any tax demand.
Discover the judgment of the CESTAT in the case of Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd, where revocation of Central Excise Registration was deemed meaningless post-GST implementation.
