Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 41722 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd (CESTAT Chennai)

The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd case brought before the CESTAT Chennai involves an issue of the revocation of Central Excise registration. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd, the respondent, had obtained Central Excise registration as a dealer but was not operating a godown, leading the Department to revoke its registration.

Analysis: The Department claimed that the respondent was not adhering to the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as they did not maintain a godown for storing the imported coal. The respondent’s appeal against the original decision to revoke the Central Excise registration was successful, which prompted the Department to file an appeal. However, the tribunal deemed the appeal infructuous in the current scenario as the country had transitioned to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT CHENNAI ORDER

Brief facts are that the respondent was engaged in import of coal and had obtained Central Excise registration as a dealer. The respondent did not have a godown and the coal was transported to the buyers directly from the Port. Department was of the view that as the respondent did not have a godown sufficient to store bulk quantity of imported coal thereby had not followed the procedures stipulated in provisions of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Show cause notice was issued to the respondent alleging that the respondent does not have a godown in Chennai and therefore cannot be registered as a dealer. After due process of law, the original authority order for revocation of the Central Excise registration. Against this, the respondent filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside the order passed by the adjudicating authority. Against such order, the department has filed the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031