The CESTAT Ahmedabad addresses a case involving a refund dispute related to abatement and excise duty, emphasizing the need for clear evidence and transparency.
Explore the case of Shyam Sel And Power Limited vs. State of U.P. in Allahabad High Court. The verdict emphasizes the role of intent in invoking CGST Act provisions.
ITAT Delhi’s decision regarding applicability of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to companies before April 1, 2017 in case of Rhythm Polymers Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT.
Madras High Court rules on SEBI penalty case, stating that incorrect PAN doesn’t exempt payment of interest. Legal analysis of the case provided.
Read about the CESTAT Hyderabad decision in Shriram Life Insurance vs. Commissioner of Customs case. CESTAT quashes service tax demand, citing Section 73(3) of the Finance Act.
Explore the Angel Engicon vs State of Bihar tax appeal case, the impact of non-constituted tribunal, and the statutory remedies under B.G.S.T. Act.
Calcutta High Court orders the refund of a penalty imposed on Ishaan Plastics Pvt. Ltd. for transporting a vehicle after the e-way bill expired, citing a time gap and lack of tax evasion intent.
In a case of tax assessment, ITAT Mumbai directs the DVO to determine Fair Market Value for Imran Kapadia. Details of the order and implications.
The Kerala High Court quashes a reassessment order, citing a violation of mandatory provisions under the Income Tax Act. Details in the article.
Understand why the assessee chose not to avail of the Conditional Service Tax Exemption with this analysis of the arguments in Isgec Unit Dahej case. Alert: Notification No. 8/2005-ST dated 01.03.2005.
