The penalty was levied for the non-disclosure of a life insurance policy held outside India in the income tax return. The ITAT ruled that the non-disclosure was a bonafide mistake and that the policy had been surrendered in the previous financial year.
ITAT disallowed the expenses claimed by by stating that a property not used for business purposes cannot be treated as a business asset. The property in question was sold and a new property was purchased using the proceeds. The expenses incurred on the new property, including watch & ward expenses and electricity expenses, were disallowed as the property was not shown as a business asset and depreciation was not claimed.
Bombay High Court quashes Deputy Commissioner’s order rejecting refund due to a typographical error in invoices, directing re-examination of the refund application with additional evidence.
ITAT Hyderabad directs reexamination of TDS linkage, offering Country Club Hospitality & Holidays Limited a chance to avoid interest liabilities in a landmark ruling.
International Financial Services Centres Authority (Authority) hereby specifies the reporting norms for Fund Management Entities (FMEs) in IFSCs
NCLT Indore directed appointment of a forensic auditor to conduct audit on irregularities related to assets of corporate debtor in case of Motel Rahans Pvt Ltd Vs JSM Devcons Pvt Ltd.
In the case being analyzed, the Delhi High Court referred to Explanation (i) to Clause (b) of Section 245A to determine whether the proceedings for assessment or reassessment had commenced for the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. The court concluded that based on a plain reading of the explanation, no such proceedings had commenced during those years. As a result, the court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Settlement Commission to deem the petitioner’s application under Section 245C(1) invalid for those assessment years.
MCA imposes penalty as company failed to circulate annual audited financial statements to its members directors statutory auditors before AGM
The company failed to hold its 3rd board meeting within the prescribed time frame, with a delay of 45 days. The penalties imposed are as follows: Rs. 54,000 on the company, Rs. 50,000 on Mr. Kamal Bali (Managing Director), and Rs. 50,000 on Ms. Alka Mishra (Company Secretary).
Delve into the Supreme Court judgment on procedural defects and substantive rights in the case of Ramnath Exports Pvt Ltd Vs Vinita Mehta. Learn about the implications of procedural irregularities on litigants’ rights.
