Pravin Natvarlal Modh Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) In the instant case the petitioner is holding a certificate as a sale tax practitioner from the year 1977. In 1983 he enrolled as a an advocate under the state bar council of Gujarat. The VAT authorities initiated misconduct proceedings under section 81 of the […]
In re Enexio Power Cooling Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the Air-Cooled condenser to be supplied by the applicant to the buyer for use in the waste-to-energy project is classifiable as ‘parts for the manufacture of waste to energy plants/devices’, attracting 5% IGST or 2.5% CGST and 2.5% APGST? As per the […]
In re Srivet Hatcheries (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Biofos Mono calcium Phosphate/Di calcium phosphate animal feed supplement, HSN Code No: 23099090, is classifiable under exempted goods, notified vide the Entry No.102 of Notification No.02/2017, dated: 28th June 2017. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING,(ANDHRA PRADESH) Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act’2017, […]
Petitioner and her co-accused in connivance with each other had made 35 fake firms and after making fake entries had issued invoices involving tax amount of more than Rupees Ten Crores. In her statement recorded on 02.08.2018, petitioner has admitted that she had prepared fake firms after accepting fee from her co-accused on the basis of fake ID’s and documents. The firms were misused for evading GST by Sandeep Goyal and Rajesh Arora. Case is still under investigation.
In re Ecool gaming solutions private limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) In the present case, applicant is recipient of supply in the form of lottery and is located in Maharashtra. The supplier of lottery is the State Government of Mizoram which is located outside State .Therefore as per the provisions of Section 7(1) of the IGST […]
Safa Mill Stores Vs Assistant State Tax Officer, Karukutty (Kerala High Court) 1. The petitioner, a partnership firm, transported certain goods ostensibly from Bombay to Perumbavoor. But when the petitioner tried to unload the goods at Malamury, Perumbavoor, the authorities checked the documents carried along with the goods and found that they did not correctly reflect […]
As notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 did not specify particular viz., whether assessee had concealed particulars of income or had furnished inaccurate particulars thereof, hence, levy of penalty could not be sustained.
In re Andhra Pradesh Technology Services Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the e-procurement Transaction Fee collected on behalf of IT E&C department results in supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of Supply as defined law? Reply : It is “Supply” as defined in SGST Act,2017 and CGST Act,2017. Whether the […]
In re M/s. R. Vidyasagar Rao Constructions (GST AAAR Telangana) Broad category of Goods Transport services are classified with a 4-digit Code as Heading 9965. Under the said classification, ‘Land Transport services’ is a sub-classification with 5-digit Code i.e, Group 99651. The said sub-classification is further divided into four categories of services, each with a six-digit Service Code (Tariff). […]
In re M/s Amalgamations Valeo Clutch Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The applicant vide their letter dated 09.08.2018 has referred to the PH posted on 07.08.2018 in connection with the subject application seeking a ruling on the aspect of amortization. They have stated that subsequent to their application, a circular No.47/21/2018-GST dated 08.06.2018 has been […]
