In re S.R.K Ladders (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the Classification of the goods manufactured by the dealer ‘Agriculture Tree Climbing Apparatus-Unipole Manually operated’- Principal raw material being Aluminium. In the instant case the goods in question “Agricultural Tree Climbing apparatus-Unipole Manually operated” is an agricultural implement and hence in common parlance it can be […]
In re Karnataka co-Coperative Milk Producers Federation Limited. (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Karnataka co-Coperative Milk Producers Federation Limited is liable to deduct GST TDS under section 51 of CGST Act on the payments made to suppliers? The issue before us to decide is whether the applicant falls under any of the categories of the persons […]
In re Hical Technologies Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the value of free of cost supplied by principal not to be included in value of supply by job worker? The nature of supply done by the applicant is one composite supply consisting of two supplies – one relating to the manufacturing service on the […]
In re Banayan Tree Advisors (p) Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether they need to charge GST on the Portfolio Management Services provided to Non-resident client, where the client pays fee in foreign currency from their overseas account to the account of the Portfolio manager? It is clearly evident from the above that the place of […]
In re Morigeri Traders (GST AAR Karnataka) 1) Whether the applicant is required to be registered under the GST Act? If the answer to the above question is affirmative, then under which section the Commission Agents are to be registered? The applicant, being a commission agent, is required to be registered under Section 22(1) of […]
In re DLF Limited (GST AAR Haryana) Authority for Advance Ruling is bound to pronounce ruling within 90 days of the receipt of application as per Section 98(6) of the CGST/HGST Act. The applicant cannot be granted any further opportunity of hearing. Hence, the application of Advance Ruling is rejected under Section 98(2) of the […]
Pr. CIT Vs NTPC Sail Power Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Electricity is capable of abstraction, transmission, transfer, delivery, possession, consumption and use like any other movable property. Following the same logic, to deny the benefit of additional depreciation to a generating entity on the basis that electricity is not an ‘article’ or ‘thing’ […]
DCIT Vs M/s Delhi Tourism Transportation Corporation Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The addition was made by the AO on the ground that although the assessee had claimed credit for Tax Deducted at Source (“TDS”, for short) on the interest income from the bank, corresponding interest income was not offered to tax by the assessee during the […]
Times Global Broadcasting Company Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) It is indisputable that by virtue of sub-sections (2A) and (2B) of Section 92CA, in case of an international transaction, the TPO would have an authority to examine any international transaction which comes to his notice during the proceedings, whether a […]
The writ petitioners have filed these applications for getting the transitional input tax credits, for which Form GST TRAN-I was filled up by them.
