In re Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. (GST AAAR Odisha) We notice that the Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha, in their findings (para 5.3 of the Order) has clearly observed that Odisha Knowledge Corporation Limited (OKCL) was promoted by the Higher Technical Education Department, Govt of Odisha and was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, as […]
ACIT Vs. Head Infotech India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee hosts online games and when the customers make payments through banking Gateways by way of credit or debit card of the relevant banks ( which are referred to as Gateways) and while transferring money to the assessee’s account, banks invariably retain service charges. It is […]
DCIT Vs. Chitradurga District Co-Op. Central Bank Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) If an assessee adopts the mercantile system of accounting and in his accounts he shows a particular income as accruing, whether that amount is really accrued or not is liable to bring the said income to tax. His accounts should reflect true and correct statement of affairs. […]
Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 received the assent of the President on the 28th September, 2020. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Legislative Department) New Delhi, the 28th September, 2020/Asvina 6, 1942 (Saka) The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 28th September, 2020 and is hereby published for general information:— THE […]
Mahadev Trading Company Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Perusal of the show cause notice indicates that to such show cause notice no response can be given by any assessee. The show cause notice is as vague as possible and does not refer to any particular facts much less point out so as to […]
DCIT Vs. Hitachi Power Europe GmbH (Madras High Court) The power to be exercised by the Settlement Commission under sub-Section (2C) of Section 245D is within a period of fifteen days’ from the date of receipt of the report of the CIT. This provision gives power to the Settlement Commission to declare an application as […]
DCIT Vs Shree Venkatesh Associates (ITAT Pune) The issue of pro-rata deduction u/s. 80IB(10) for eligible units has been considered by the jurisdictional ITAT, Pune in case of Ramsukh Properties (supra) and M/s D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd (supra) and IT AT, Nagpur in case of AIR Developers(supra) and allowed such pro-rata deduction. The ITAT, Mumbai […]
Recovery of assets of defaulter member and recovery of funds from debit balance clients of defaulter member for meeting the obligations of clients / Stock Exchange / Clearing Corporation
Sanjay Sharma Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessing Officer has accepted not only he sales figures but has also accepted that total purchases. Under accounting principles, a liability can only be brought into account by a credit entry in the books of account in favour of the person to whom the money is payable’ Thus, there […]
Vishal Constructions Vs. ITO (ITAT Pune) We note that in the present appeal the assessee claimed deduction Rs.18,80,000/- u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act. The AO held that the assessee has violated the provisions of section 80IB(10) of the Act as built up area of shops and commercial establishments exceeded 5000 sq. ft. For such violation […]
