Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Sharma Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3520/DEL/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sanjay Sharma Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

Assessing Officer has accepted not only he sales figures but has also accepted that total purchases. Under accounting principles, a liability can only be brought into account by a credit entry in the books of account in favour of the person to whom the money is payable’ Thus, there is marked difference between a credit representing a liability payable by the assessee and a credit representing monies received from another person. It is because of this distinction, a liability for purchase which has been credited in the account of the supplier cannot be added under section 68 of the Act, more so when the purchase has been accepted as genuine and a deduction therefore has been allowed.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)- 38, New Delhi dated 19.03.2019 pertaining to A.Y. 2015-16.

2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that the CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.7,99,173/- out of sundry creditors outstanding at the close of the A.Y under consideration.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031