In re Goodwill Industrial Canteen (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Clarification regarding applicable GST to the outdoor catering services rendered by them to their clients. The services of the applicant of supplying food and beverages on the premises of industrial unit/office, which are on the terms of the contract with M/s Kone Elevators and such other contracts, […]
In re C.P.R. Mill (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Classification of ‘Cattle Feed in Cake Form’ and exemption if any The product ‘Cattle feed in cake form’ manufactured by the Applicant is classifiable under Chapter Heading 23099010 and stands exempted as per vide SI.No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28th June 2017 as amended and SI.No. […]
‘Disc Brake Pads’ manufactured and supplied by the Applicant are classified under Heading 87083000 and covered under SI. No. 170 of Schedule IV of Notification No. 01/2017 CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and SI.No. 170 of Schedule IV of G.O. (Ms) No. 62 dated 29.06.2017 No. ll(2)/CTR/532(d-4)/2017 attracting 14% CGST/14% SGST respectively.
In re Erode Manjal Vanigarkal Matrum Kidangu Urimaiyalargal Sangam (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) Agent, who is a member of the applicant stores the turmeric in their godown, the sales of which is as per the guidelines of EMC. Also from the invoices furnished, it is seen that the invoice is raised by the agent on the […]
Uploading supporting documents- The procedure for eSANCHIT on the export side is similar to the one prescribed for eSANCHIT in imports vide Circular No. 40/2017 dated 13.10.2017. Briefly, salient features are described as below: –
Circular No. 28/2018-Customs- CBIC clarified that in case the jurisdictional laboratory does not have testing facility for a given sample, it would be open to the field formations to send such samples to one of the other revenue laboratories which have the facility to test the given sample, instead of availing services of an outside […]
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed a final order imposing penalty on Panasonic Energy India Co. Limited Panasonic) and Geep Industries (India) Private Limited (Geep) for colluding to fix prices of zinc-carbon dry cell batteries in India. In respect of Panasonic, CCI granted 100 percent reduction in penalty by invoking the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act) read with the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009 (Lesser Penalty Regulations).
M/s Viraat Traders Vs State of Punjab and others (Punjab and Haryana HC) Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 23.05.2018 passed by Excise and Taxation Officer Ludhiana-3 cancelling the registration of the petitioner under the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in short ‘the Punjab GST Act’) It is not […]
Finding of AO is based merely on suspicion and surmises without any tangible material to show that the assessee has introduced his own unaccounted income in the share of long term capital gain even otherwise the reliance of the statements recorded by the Investigation Wing, Kolkata wherein without giving an opportunity of cross examination is a complete violation of principles of natural justice
M/s. Balaji Construction Company Vs state Of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) It is stated that the petitioner had applied well in time for registration under the GST Act to enable him to migrate within a specific time period. In spite of various reminders, the concerned authorities have not completed the process of migration and now […]
