Case Law Details
Case Name : Re. Panasonic Corporation, Japan & Others (Competition Commission of India)
Appeal Number : Suo Motu Case No. 02/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/08/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Competition Commission of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
In Re: Anti-competitive conduct in the Dry-Cell Batteries Market in India Vs. Panasonic Corporation, Japan & Others.
CCI decides another Lesser Penalty case in respect of cartelisation in Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Batteries Market
The Competition Commission of India (‘CCI’) passed a final order imposing penalty on Panasonic Energy India Co. Limited (‘Panasonic’) and Geep Industries (India) Private Limited (‘Geep’) for colluding to fix prices of zinc-carbon dry cell batteries in India. In respect of Panasonic, CCI granted 100 percent reduction in penalty by invoking the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘the Act’) read with the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009 (‘Lesser Penalty Regulations’).
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
