ITAT Ahmedabad held that no disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act warranted as interest-free funds exceed the investments made, and there is no evidence to suggest that borrowed funds were used for such investments.
Supreme Court held that Covid-19 lockdown was a valid reason for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration to auction purchaser under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The building, namely Kanchanjunga was constructed in the year 1972 by its promoters M/s Kailash Nath & Associates which had engaged some persons to look after the security of the building maintenance and cleaning of the common area of the building and lift etc.
Supreme Court held that while deciding custody of minor children, the only paramount consideration is the welfare of the minor. The parties’ rights cannot be allowed to override the child’s welfare.
Karnataka High Court held that deeming fiction under section 405 of the IPC would be attracted only when there is deduction made by the employer and not otherwise. In absence of deduction, the deeming fiction cannot be invoked nor could there be said to be an offence amounting to criminal breach of trust.
CESTAT Mumbai held that rejection of request for amendment of shipping bills u/s. 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the ground of delay unjustified as legal provisions doesn’t prescribe any specific time limit.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that claim of exemption u/s. 10(38) on sale of shares rightly disallowed as assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of shares was an arranged affair to convert its own unaccounted money.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that cash seized cannot be adjusted against tax liability as advance tax and hence interest under section 234B of the Income Tax Act on delayed payment of advance tax duly leviable.
ITAT Delhi held that penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act not leviable since income assessed and income processed are same. Accordingly, in absence of under reporting of income, no penalty can be levied.
Gujarat High Court held that denial of benefit of lower rate of tax u/s. 115BAA of the Income Tax Act on technical ground of mere delay in filing of Form 10-IC unjustified as all the other conditions duly satisfied.
