Whereas, the designated authority vide notification No. 15/8/2010-DGAD, dated the 26th July,2010, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1 dated the 26th July,2010, had initiated review in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the said Customs Tariff Act) and in pursuance of rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995
Export of Sandalwood De-oiled Spent Dust shall be permitted only through the ports of Delhi, Mumbai, Calcutta and Chennai after physical verification of consignments by the concerned Regional Wildlife Warden of the Ministry of Environment & Forests.
Notification No. 28/2011-Customs, New Delhi, the 4th March, 2011 . Whereas, the designated authority vide notification No. 15/9/2010-DGAD, dated the 26th July,2010, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 26th July,2010, had initiated review in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the said Customs Tariff Act) and in pursuance of rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), in the matter of continuation of anti-dumping duty on imports of Certain Rubber Chemicals (MBTS) falling under tariff item 2925 20 or 2934 20 or 3812 of the First Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act, originating in, or exported from People’s Republic of China, imposed vide notification of the Government of India,
An individual who is to be appointed as a director of an Indian Company is required to obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN) from Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India in compliance with the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) read with Companies (Directors Identification Number) Rules, 2006 (DIN Rules). The objective of DIN is to establish with MCA the existence/residence of a person, who intends to become a director of a company. The DIN Rules provides detailed procedure for obtaining DIN. General Circular No.5/2011
4th March, 2011. S.O. 482(E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 54 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the Central Government, in public interest, hereby exempts an enterprise, whose control, shares, voting rights or assets are being acquired has assets of the value of not more than Rs. 250/- crores or turnover of not more than Rs. 750/- crores from the provisions of section 5 of the said Act for a period of five years.
4th March, 2011. S.O. 481 (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 54 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the Central Government, in public interest, hereby exempts the ‘Group’ exercising less than fifty per cent of voting rights in other enterprise from the provisions of section 5 of the said Act for a period of five years.
4th March, 2011-S.O. 480(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 20, of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the Central Government, in consultation with the Competition Commission of India, hereby enhance, on the basis of the wholesale price index, the value of assets and the value of turnover, by fifty per cent for the purposes of section 5 of the said Act.
4th March, 2011- S.O. 479(E) .- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st day of June, 2011 as the date on which sections 5, 6,20,29, 30 and section 31 of the said Act shall come into force.
Budget 2010-11 FM pushes for affordable homes; full tax rebate to builders
ITAT Practice Note on Change of Address of assessee-In Jagjivandas Nandlal vs. ITAT 236 CTR 274, the Bombay High Court requested the President of the Tribunal to consider make it compulsory for assessees to amend Form 36 for change of address instead of merely intimating vide letter. The Tribunal has now issued the following practice note:
