Follow Us:

If interest received on accrual basis the addition qua this year interest can be made in this year and not of entire interest

December 8, 2011 894 Views 0 comment Print

Sri Suman Bose Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) In respect to accrued interest, it is not clear whether the interest is received by assessee on accrual basis or on receipt basis. If the interest received on accrual basis the addition qua this year interest can be made in this year and not of entire interest. In case, interest is received on receipt basis the amount of Rs.24,000/- – Rs.12,600/- can be added in this year. This fact can be verified by the Assessing Officer after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Cost Accounting Records (Telecommunication Industry) Rules, 2011

December 7, 2011 703 Views 0 comment Print

Authentication of Annexure to the Compliance Report, – The Annexure to the compliance report shall be approved by the Board of Directors and certified by the Cost Accountant before submitting the same to the Central Government by the company.

The Cost Accounting Records (Sugar Industry) Rules, 2011

December 7, 2011 973 Views 0 comment Print

any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any such right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as aforesaid, and; any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if those rules had not been superseded.

Notification No.G.S.R. 868 – Income Tax Dated 7/12/2011

December 7, 2011 637 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No.G.S.R. 868/2011 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Government Savings Certificates Act, 1959 (46 of 1959), the Central Government hereby specifies that the National Savings Certificates-IX Issue shall be the class of Savings Certificates to which the said Act applies

Cost Accounting Records (Pharmaceutical Industry) Rules,2011

December 7, 2011 1972 Views 0 comment Print

every officer thereof who is in default, including the persons referred to in sub-section (6) of section 209 of the Act, shall be punishable as provided under sub-sections (5) and (7) of section 209 of Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).

Cost Accounting Records (Petroleum Industry) Rules, 2011

December 7, 2011 1216 Views 0 comment Print

any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any such right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as aforesaid, and; any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if those rules had not been superseded.

Cost Accounting Records (Fertilizer Industry) Rules, 2011

December 7, 2011 1348 Views 0 comment Print

any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any such right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as aforesaid, and; any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if those rules had not been superseded.

Cost Accounting Records (Electricity Industry) Rules, 2011

December 7, 2011 652 Views 0 comment Print

Authentication of Annexure to the Compliance Report, – The Annexure to the compliance report shall be approved by the Board of Directors and certified by the Cost Accountant before submitting the same to the Central Government by the company.

Gratuity Payable only if employee put in 5 years of service – HC

December 7, 2011 13311 Views 0 comment Print

The first respondent filed a claim petition before the second respondent seeking payment of gratuity for the period, which he has rendered services to the petitioner’s lorry transport, from 01.04.1991 to 19.04.2007, on which date he had voluntarily stopped himself from services. He claimed gratuity for a period of 10 years and a monthly salary of Rs.3,600/-. The total gratuity claim was Rs.28,800/-. The said application filed by the first respondent was taken on file by the second respondent as P.G.No.90 of 2007 and notice was issued to the petitioner.

Transaction cannot be treated as Bogus merely for being a Off market transaction

December 7, 2011 3196 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT Vs. Shri Ravindrakumar Toshniwal (ITAT Mumbai)- – Tribunal in the case of Mukesh R. Marolia wherein it has been held that off market transaction is not a unlawful activity and there is no relevance in seeking details of share transaction from stock exchange when the sale was not on stock exchange and relying upon it for making addition.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031