Standard Operating Procedure for listed subsidiary company desirous of getting delisted through a Scheme of Arrangement wherein the listed parent holding company and the listed subsidiary are in the same line of business.
On the GST front, by innovating and using the recently introduced `RFID-Vehicle related Report’, an analysis of risky vehicles was undertaken by the officers of DGGI (SZU). The verification revealed that iron scrap was being supplied by existent but un-registered firms under the invoices for GST ITC of non-existent and bogus firms. Envelopes recovered from the drivers of the detained trucks contained the invoices of fake firms whose invoices are used for passing of ITC as well as the firms actually supplying the goods. The total ITC passed on by the above-mentioned non-existent firms is Rs. 14.48 Crore.
SEBI decided to reduce the time period after listing for submitting the application to 2 months from the existing period of 4 months as stated in above mentioned circular. The same is subject to the condition that all issue related complaints have been resolved by the merchant banker/ issuer.
In continuation to the SB Order No. 01/2017 dated 29.03.2017, the undersigned is directed to inform that Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Dept. of Revenue, CBDT) vide Notification dated 12.03.2021 issued vide GSR 175(E), has inserted the following sub rule in Rule 114E of Income Tax Rules, 1962.
The Assessing Officer having arrived at his subjective satisfaction based on additional fresh material placed before him that the petitioner had not fully and truly disclosed all the material facts necessary for his assessment for the relevant assessment year and prima facie his income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, he was fully justified in initiating the proceedings under section 147/148 of the said Act.
(1) These regulations may be called the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Banking) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2021. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee is aggrieved by the action of the AO in making a disallowance of Rs 56,59,609/- on account of Provision made for Standard Assets. It was submitted that as per the scheme of taxing income of the assessee is to be computed as per provisions […]
EYGBS (India) LLP Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Banglore) CESTAT find that the impugned order has rejected the refund claims on the grounds that the appellant has violated the condition at para 3(III)(a), 3(III)(d) and Rule 5 of SEZ Notification No.12/2013-ST dt. 01/07/2013. Further, I find that the appellant has SEZ units as well […]
Surana Mutha Bhasali Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) The doctrine of approbate and reprobate does not allow the Department to blow hot and cold in the same breath, thereby accepting one consequence arising from the statement of the assessee while rejecting the other one. When the assessee made a surrender with the clear backdrop of […]
Greetings to all Chartered Accountants on CA Day. This community has a vital role in India’s progress. I call upon all CAs to keep the focus on excellence so that Indian firms emerge as one of the best globally.
