Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Likha Saaya Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Likha Saaya Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati) ITAT Guwahati Deletes ₹1.75 Cr Cash Deposit Addition & Quashes 263 Revision – Redeposit of Own Withdrawals Accepted, Revision During Pending Appeal Held Invalid Assessee, a Scheduled Tribe member of Arunachal Pradesh, was engaged in transport contracts with the State Government &  claimed exemption u/s 10(26). For AY 2010–11, he reported gross receipts of ₹13.44 crore &  offered 10% as income, which was accepted as exempt. However, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹1.75 crore in Vijaya Bank &  ₹18 lakh in Axis Bank, treating them as u...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031