Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Likha Saaya Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Likha Saaya Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati)

ITAT Guwahati Deletes ₹1.75 Cr Cash Deposit Addition & Quashes 263 Revision – Redeposit of Own Withdrawals Accepted, Revision During Pending Appeal Held Invalid

Assessee, a Scheduled Tribe member of Arunachal Pradesh, was engaged in transport contracts with the State Government &  claimed exemption u/s 10(26). For AY 2010–11, he reported gross receipts of ₹13.44 crore &  offered 10% as income, which was accepted as exempt. However, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹1.75 crore in Vijaya Bank &  ₹18 l

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Routine Business Cash Deposits Not Taxable Despite No ITR Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition Overturned for Earlier Property Booking Revenue’s Section 68 Challenge Rejected on Evidence and Repayment Advance Loss Treated as Trading Loss: ITAT Allows ₹1.5 Cr Write-Off Finance Broker Taxed Only on Brokerage as No Evidence of Income Found View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031