Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Likha Saaya Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Likha Saaya Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati) ITAT Guwahati Deletes ₹1.75 Cr Cash Deposit Addition & Quashes 263 Revision – Redeposit of Own Withdrawals Accepted, Revision During Pending Appeal Held Invalid Assessee, a Scheduled Tribe member of Arunachal Pradesh, was engaged in transport contracts with the State Government &  claimed exemption u/s 10(26). For AY 2010–11, he reported gross receipts of ₹13.44 crore &  offered 10% as income, which was accepted as exempt. However, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹1.75 crore in Vijaya Bank &  ₹18 lakh in Axis Bank, treating them as u...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Original Section 12A Certificate Cannot Deny Section 12AB Registration: Mumbai ITAT Flat Registration for Mortgage Alone Does Not Trigger Section 56(2)(x): Mumbai ITAT Mere Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Cannot Deny PF Deduction: ITAT Mumbai Specific Performance Denied for Failure to Prove Continuous Readiness & Willingness: SC Pune ITAT Refuses to Condon 661-Day Delay in 12AB Appeal Over Vague Claims View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930