Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamaluddin Hamed Salmani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamaluddin Hamed Salmani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Void When Issue Already Examined in Original Scrutiny- No Fresh Material- Change of Opinion on 54F Claim Not Permitted- ITAT Quashes ₹1.63 Cr LTCG Addition Under 54F Reopening Assessee’s reassessment u/s 147 was initiated on the ground that capital gains exemption u/s 54F was wrongly claimed on sale of land, as the new property was allegedly received in loan settlement & not purchased from sale proceeds. The AO treated ₹1.63 crore as taxable LTCG, & the CIT(A) confirmed it. Assessee contended that the issue of 54F exe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930