Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Routine Group Support Not FTS or Royalty: ITAT Mumbai Grants ₹109.7 Cr Relief

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 9904
Case Name
Solvay S. A. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2022-23
Advertisement


Solvay S. A. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Routine Intra-Group Support Not FTS or Royalty – ITAT Mumbai Allows ₹109.7 Cr Relief

Key Issue

Whether ₹109.73 crore received by Solvay S.A., a Belgium-based multinational chemical company, from its Indian group entities for “functional support services” constituted Fees for Technical Services (FTS) or Royalty under s.9(1)(vii) & Article 12(3) of the India-Belgium DTAA.

Facts

Solvay S.A. rendered centralized & standardized services – such as IT infrastructure, procurement assistance, shared finance & HR support, communication, & legal compliance — to its Indian subsidiaries Solvay Specialties India Pvt. Ltd. & Sunshine Chemicals under a “Functional Service Agreement”.

The company contended that:

  • Services were routine & non-exclusive, intended only to bring uniformity across the group.
  • No technical knowledge or know-how was “made available” to Indian entities.
  • Hence, receipts were not taxable as FTS or royalty under the DTAA.

AO held otherwise, treating the income as royalty for imparting commercial or technical information, while the DRP reclassified it as FTS, alternatively as royalty.

Assessee’s Arguments

  • Services were standard facilities, not managerial, technical or consultancy in nature.
  • Neither management control nor specialized human intervention existed.
  • The MFN clause under the Belgium DTAA should apply, aligning with “make-available” standard from the India-UK/USA treaties.
  • Past assessments accepted the same treatment – rule of consistency should apply.
  • Relied on precedents: UPS SCS Asia Ltd., Springer Verlag GmbH, Adidas Sourcing Ltd., Kotak Securities Ltd., Avenet International Hong Kong Ltd., etc.

Tribunal’s Observations

  • The Tribunal examined the nature of each service (IT, procurement, shared services, industrial, HR, communication, finance, legal, etc.) & found them to be routine, centralized corporate support without transfer of technical or managerial expertise.
  • Referring to OECD e-commerce report (2001), Panalfa Autoelektrik Ltd., & GVK Industries (SC), it reiterated that:

Managerial services require control over business operations.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,104

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.