Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hanif Osman Ravda Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Hanif Osman Ravda Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Presumptive Income u/s 44AD Covers Cash Deposits – No Further 69A Addition; Entire ₹13.71 Lakh Deleted in Assessee’s Favour Assessee, a small trader in cutlery, did not file return u/s 139(1) as his income was below taxable limit. AO obtained information of cash deposits of ₹13,71,365 in Union Bank account & issued notice u/s 148 on 27.03.2019. Assessee replied but did not file return in time. AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, ignoring Assessee’s business explanatio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031