Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Devraj Vishwasrao Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Devraj Vishwasrao Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Same Question, Many Notices? ITAT Says: One Default, One Penalty – Not a Buy 1 Get 3 Free- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) reduced – Multiple notices for same info = single default Assessee faced a penalty under Section 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued u/s 142(1) during assessment proceedings for A.Y. 2015-16. AO issued multiple notices, one after another, asking for the same information. Since Assessee did not fully comply initially, AO treated each non-compliance as a separate default & levied ₹10,000 per notice, resulting i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930