Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajesh Kumar Sharma Vs CIT(A)/NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajesh Kumar Sharma Vs CIT(A)/NFAC (ITAT Delhi) Rule of Lenity as a Boon for Assessees [CIT vs. Vegetable Products Ltd. (1973)] – The appeal concerns an addition of ₹21,95,375 made by the tax authorities, representing the difference between Sharma’s actual purchase price of a flat (₹33,76,625) and the stamp duty valuation (₹55,72,000). – The addition was made under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, which is relevant for cases where the stamp duty value of property exceeds the actual transaction price, similar in nature to Section 50C which applies to capital gai...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experience in direct tax litigation (Appearing before ITAT, CIT(A) and DRP) | Income Tax Assessment & Appeals | Tax Compliance & Advisory | Transfer Pricing Disputes | Tax Planning & Structuring | Legal Research & Drafting | Corporate Taxation | Cross-Border Taxation | Litigation Str View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 69C Addition unsustainable if expenditure is recorded & source explained Unsigned Section 142(1) Notice Renders Section 144 Assessment Invalid: ITAT Agra Speed Post is not equivalent to Registered Post for Section 148 notice service Controversy on Section 153D Approvals Without Application of Mind Income Tax Section 143(2) Notice must be in revised format as per CBDT: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930