Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Jitendra Kumar Agarwal (HUF) (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Jitendra Kumar Agarwal (HUF) (ITAT Jaipur) Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence – ITAT Confirms Deletion of Rs.1.49 Cr Addition- Loose Paper Not Proof of Cash Loans – Future-Dated Entries on Seized Paper Not Reliable Revenue filed appeal against order of CIT(A) deleting addition of Rs.1,49,00,000/- u/s 69A towards alleged cash loan advances & Rs.13,41,000/- towards estimated interest. During search & survey on 28.07.2016, loose paper was found containing hand-written details of amounts, names of parties & dates. AO held these reflected fresh cash loans of Rs.69 lakh t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930