Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Jitendra Kumar Agarwal (HUF) (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Jitendra Kumar Agarwal (HUF) (ITAT Jaipur) Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence – ITAT Confirms Deletion of Rs.1.49 Cr Addition- Loose Paper Not Proof of Cash Loans – Future-Dated Entries on Seized Paper Not Reliable Revenue filed appeal against order of CIT(A) deleting addition of Rs.1,49,00,000/- u/s 69A towards alleged cash loan advances & Rs.13,41,000/- towards estimated interest. During search & survey on 28.07.2016, loose paper was found containing hand-written details of amounts, names of parties & dates. AO held these reflected fresh cash loans of Rs.69 lakh t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930