Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Jitendra Kumar Agarwal (HUF) (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Jitendra Kumar Agarwal (HUF) (ITAT Jaipur) Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence – ITAT Confirms Deletion of Rs.1.49 Cr Addition- Loose Paper Not Proof of Cash Loans – Future-Dated Entries on Seized Paper Not Reliable Revenue filed appeal against order of CIT(A) deleting addition of Rs.1,49,00,000/- u/s 69A towards alleged cash loan advances & Rs.13,41,000/- towards estimated interest. During search & survey on 28.07.2016, loose paper was found containing hand-written details of amounts, names of parties & dates. AO held these reflected fresh cash loans of Rs.69 lakh t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031