Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nirmalkumar Agrawal (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Nagpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nirmalkumar Agrawal (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Nagpur) Distinction Between No Enquiry & Inadequate Enquiry- Loan Verified by AO Through Bank & Financials – Tribunal Bars PCIT’s Revision Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹2,60,860. Based on FIU information that Navdurga Advisory Pvt. Ltd. (NAPL) was a shell company, assessment was reopened u/s 147. AO after enquiry accepted that Assessee had taken a genuine loan of ₹20 lakh (not ₹40 lakh as alleged by FIU) from NAPL, verified through bank statements, confirmations & financials, & completed assessment at returned income...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031