Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vasudhevan Muralidharan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vasudhevan Muralidharan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ₹3.79 Cr Addition u/s 68 Remanded – ITAT Allows Assessee to Prove Sale of Agri Lands with Fresh Evidence The appeal concerned, an individual engaged in the bakery business, for AY 2018-19. The dispute arose from an addition of ₹3.79 crore u/s 68 made by AO, treating the capital introduced in Assessee’s books as unexplained cash credit. During scrutiny, AO noted that Assessee had introduced capital of ₹3.85 crore in his business. Assessee explained that the funds were sourced from the sale of two agricultural lands & two vacant plots. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930