Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs. Sincon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Patna)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sincon Infrastructure Private. Ltd (ITAT Patna) Mere Non-Filing of Returns by Suppliers Doesn’t Make Purchases Bogus – ITAT Patna Upholds CIT(A) Assessee company engaged in the business of construction & maintenance of roads & bridges, filed return of income declaring ₹2.40 crore. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS since substantial purchases were made from parties who had not filed returns of income. AO noted that Assessee had made purchases of ₹4.98 crore from seven such suppliers. Notices u/s 133(6) were issued, but only one party responded. AO therefore ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders ITAT Holds Section 80AC Bar No Longer Applies, Restores Section 80P Claim Appeal Delay of 3 Years Condoned by ITAT on Professional Advice Grounds Section 43B Deduction Cannot Be Lost Due to Inadvertent Non-Claim in Return – ITAT Gives Fresh Opportunity to Verify Property Tax Payment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930