Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : T.M.A. Pai Foundation Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : NA
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
T.M.A. Pai Foundation Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee trust registered u/s 12A(1)(ac)(i)  vide   Registration   dated 05.04.2022 from the AY 22-23 to 26-27 &  has been granted the provisional approval vide URN dated 07/04/2022  under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) from  07.04.2022 to assessment year 2024-25 in Form No.10AC by PCIT/CIT.  Assessee trust thereafter applied for permanent approval as per clause (iii) of first proviso to 80G(5) in Form No.10AB on 10.08.2024. CIT(E)   rejected the approval u/s 80G   vide Order in Form 10AD dated 17/0...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031