Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : X L Interiors Vs Deputy Commissioner (Intelligence) (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
X L Interiors Vs Deputy Commissioner (Intelligence) (Kerala High Court) Conclusion: Since the word ‘period’ used in Sub Section (3) of Section 74 did not relate to any financial year but only to a period for which a notice to be issued under Sub Section (1) of Section 74, therefore, it was difficult to hold that the bunching of show cause notices was illegal and contrary to the provisions of Section 74 of the CGST Act. Bunching of show cause notices did not cause any prejudice to assessee as it was open to assessee to take up any contention peculiar to any particular year in the reply to t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930