Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tvl. Maxtile AAC Block Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 10670 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tvl. Maxtile AAC Block Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)

Introduction: In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court addressed the legality of provisional property attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017. This article explores the court’s decision in the case of TVL Maxtile AAC Block Vs State Tax Officer, shedding light on key aspects regarding tax demand and recovery procedures.

Background:

We are aware of the Section 83 of the CGST Act,2017 pertaining to the provisional attachment of the property, where as a procedure of demand and recovery, the authorities initiates the provisional attachment of property to avoid evasion of tax by the taxpayer. In the present case, the Madras High Court held one of the important aspects regarding the attachment of the property.

Facts of the Case:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031