Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anish Niranjan Nanavaty Vs Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NCLT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anish Niranjan Nanavaty Vs Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NCLT Mumbai) Application accepted as Resolution Plan met the requirements of Section 30(2) of the IBC Code and the Regulations 37, 38, 38(1A) and 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations Conclusion: Resolution Plan met the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code and the Regulations 37, 38, 38(1A) and 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations. The Resolution Plan was not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and was in accordance with law. It should be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930