Applicant cannot seek an advance ruling on a completed transaction

In re lonbond Coating Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu)

In a significant development that underscores the procedural nuances of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework in India, the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) Tamilnadu delivered a pivotal verdict on a request by Ionbond Coating Private Limited. This detailed exploration aims to dissect the AAR’s decision, providing valuable insights for businesses on the scope and limitations of seeking advance rulings under the GST regime.

Background of the Case

Ionbond Coating Private Limited, a GST registrant engaged in coating activities on goods belonging to customers, sought an advance ruling regarding the GST implications of transferring leasehold rights of a property. The property, originally leased from the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT), was transferred to Kanta Flex (India) Private Limited after obtaining necessary approvals.

The Advance Ruling Application

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.