Case Law Details
Commissioner of Customs Vs Rajhans Enterprises (CESTAT Bangalore)
Introduction: In a recent legal development, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Bangalore addressed a crucial matter involving the rejection of a refund claim for excess customs duty by M/s. Rajhans Enterprises. This case revolves around the reassessment of the Bill of Entry and the subsequent implications for the application of concessional rates.
Detailed Analysis:
The dispute originated when M/s. Rajhans Enterprises imported polymers of ethlin and paid the appropriate duty. Subsequently, they filed a refund claim citing an inadvertent mistake in not availing the benefit of a specific notification. The rejection of this refund claim by the adjudication authority led to a series of appeals and counter-arguments.
The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal, asserting that the onus to avail the exemption notification lies with the importer, subject to fulfilling laid-down conditions. However, the CESTAT, in its Final Order No. 22462 of 2017, remanded the case back to the original authority, directing a reassessment of the Bill of Entry before deciding the refund application.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
