This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Extended period of limitation invoked as facts suppressed with intention to evade payment of tax
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Senthil Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Senthil Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that extended period of limitation invoked as appellant suppressed provision of service falling under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning and Installation’ service with intention to evade payment of tax.
Facts- During the audit of accounts of M/s. Bharathi Constructions, Erode by the officers attached to Salem Commissionerate in November 2008, it was noticed that the appellants had carried out erection and installation related work to the tune of Rs.34,96,200/- a...
Author Info
