Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Senthil Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Senthil Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that extended period of limitation invoked as appellant suppressed provision of service falling under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning and Installation’ service with intention to evade payment of tax. Facts- During the audit of accounts of M/s. Bharathi Constructions, Erode by the officers attached to Salem Commissionerate in November 2008, it was noticed that the appellants had carried out erection and installation related work to the tune of Rs.34,96,200/- and no service tax...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031