Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Senthil Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Senthil Engineering Works Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that extended period of limitation invoked as appellant suppressed provision of service falling under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning and Installation’ service with intention to evade payment of tax. Facts- During the audit of accounts of M/s. Bharathi Constructions, Erode by the officers attached to Salem Commissionerate in November 2008, it was noticed that the appellants had carried out erection and installation related work to the tune of Rs.34,96,200/- and no service tax...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031