Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Paritosh Rungta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014 –15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Paritosh Rungta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that CIT(A) has passed the order ex-parte due to the non-appearance of/on behalf of the assessee. Accordingly, de novo adjudication ordered as CIT(A) didn’t rendered any finding on merits. Facts- The assessee, an individual, has credited commission income of Rs. 1,79,89,972, and debited other expenses including loss from derivatives (F & O) of Rs.1,21,06,336, to the profit and loss account. Further, interest income of Rs.5,70,917, was shown as income from other sources. Accordingly, vide assessment order dated 23/12/2016, passed u/s. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930